Why still 30-year fixed loans when cheaper ARMs exist? Rates at 7.75%, ARMs offer 1% lower.

“Why do home buyers keep taking out 30-year fixed loans if they’re no longer a good deal?

And arguably even a bad deal at this point.

The 30-year fixed is now close to its 50-year average of ~7.75%.

If folks don’t expect to keep these loans for more than a few years, why are we not exploring alternatives?

I get that the 30-year fixed was a no-brainer for much of the past decade, but not anymore.

There are options such as a 5/6 or 7/6 ARM, which offer a fixed interest rate for 5-7 years before first adjustment.

And they come with rates that are anywhere from 0.50% to 1% lower than the 30-year fixed.

If they became more mainstream, competition would likely increase this discount even more.

Instead, it’s just more 30-year fixed-rate loans at 7% that nobody expects to keep.

Yet they’re paying the premium for the security of no rate adjustments during the loan term.

If these higher rates truly are the new normal, it might be time to roll out alternatives.”

Uh-oh! It looks like you're using an ad blocker.

Our website relies on ads and the generous support of readers like you to keep delivering free, high-quality content. Right now, we are facing serious funding challenges and we need your help more than ever. Disable your ad blocker and this message will vanish. You can also sign up for a membership to enjoy an ad-free experience while supporting our work: https://citizenwatchreport.com/plans/subscriptions/ Your support helps us stay independent, continue our work, and keep content free for everyone. We truly appreciate your understanding and thank you for standing with us.