This is the part where bubbles always start lying to people. JPMorgan is literally listing the same warning signs we heard before 2000 and 2008, but everyone shrugs because the word AI sounds magical. When companies are burning insane amounts of cash and promising the future will fix it later, that is not innovation, that is leverage dressed up as destiny. A trillion in infrastructure for a fraction of the revenue is not confidence, it is desperation. If demand hiccups even a little, this thing does not deflate gently, it snaps.
The entire AI bubble is propped up by a company that is on $13 billion revenue btw.
They just tried to raise at 750 BILLION valuation.
AI is the biggest bubble we’ve ever seen. pic.twitter.com/aLm3XS2fHA
— Zoomer 🧢 (@zoomyzoomm) December 18, 2025
So this is what 2008 felt like
— Zoomer 🧢 (@zoomyzoomm) December 17, 2025
JPMorgan lists the exact bubble markers:
- “Abundance and availability of credit”
- “Increasing leverage”
- “Decaying underwriting standards”
- “Gap between valuations and cash flows”
Harvard Gazette warns of systemic risk
- The AI bubble could “disrupt the entire economy.”
- Hyperscalers are taking on liabilities large enough to create systemic exposure.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2025/12/should-u-s-be-worried-about-ai-bubble/
This is the same type of systemic‑risk language used in 2008.
Michael Burry might’ve been right about AI being a bubble, I mean these stocks are down 40-50% from their highs and still dropping. We promised solving cancer, creating new drug therapies for auto immune diseases. Instead, all I see is AI slop photos and videos, AI has honestly…
— j (@jtsla4) December 17, 2025
A simple rule on "buying the dip"
Don't back up the truck until it reclaims a few moving averages (eg the 21 day).
A stock in a drawdown can last months or years.
Buying too early just means your cost basis is fucked + you're sitting in "dead money" for a long time.
Patience.
— Zoomer 🧢 (@zoomyzoomm) December 18, 2025
Aswath Damodaran: "Market excluding the Mag-7 is pretty expensive."
I agree that Mag-7 valuations are less concerning, as they are justified by consistent growth and margin expansion.
What's concerning is the rest of the market trading at 22x forward earnings. pic.twitter.com/Fyc6lruRBM
— Oguz Erkan (@oguzerkan) December 18, 2025
What if the AI revolution isn’t the unstoppable force it seems to be? While headlines celebrate breakthroughs in machine learning and the meteoric rise of companies like OpenAI and Nvidia, a less glamorous story is unfolding beneath the surface, one of unsustainable spending, speculative investments, and financial entanglements that could unravel the entire industry. Consider this: OpenAI has committed to infrastructure spending of $1.15 trillion over the next five years, yet its projected revenue for 2025 is a mere $20 billion. This staggering imbalance isn’t just a red flag for one company, it’s a warning sign for an entire sector that’s chasing growth at all costs, much like the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. Could the AI boom we’re witnessing today be little more than a house of cards?
https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/openai-infrastructure-costs-ai-bubble/
How is shorting $PLTR at $180 // 73x revenue not free money here… pic.twitter.com/WxFZxmelNn
— Zoomer 🧢 (@zoomyzoomm) December 18, 2025