One of Ireland’s best known columnists says he was explicitly told that only negative stories about Trump would be published

This is a very big deal. One of Ireland's longest-running and best known opinion columnists says he was explicitly told that only negative stories about Trump would be published. Many of us have long suspected that there was editorial pressure to attack Trump in the Irish… https://t.co/MEWUFwjUjT — Dr. Eoin Lenihan (@EoinLenihan) April 27, 2026 …

READ MORE

Switzerland has temporarily suspended new arms export licenses to the United States, explicitly citing its neutrality in the ongoing U.S.–Israeli conflict with Iran.

The Swiss Government announced that it will not grant new licenses to export war materiel to the United States while the armed conflict with Iran continues. This is based on the Swiss federal law on war materiel, which strictly prohibits exports to countries involved in active international armed conflicts. According to the official statement, “the …

READ MORE

No, Joe Rogan didn’t explicitly say Trump has been a terrible president.

🚨BREAKING: JOE ROGAN SAYS TRUMP HAS BEEN A TERRIBLE PRESIDENT pic.twitter.com/PnxqhuToEe — Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) February 12, 2026 Factcheck: No, Joe Rogan didn’t explicitly say Trump has been a terrible president. In a recent podcast, he criticized the handling of Epstein files, stating it “looks terrible for Trump” since Trump called it a hoax, but …

READ MORE

ICE officers in Minnesota just received new orders explicitly telling them “DO NOT COMMUNICATE OR ENGAGE WITH AGITATORS”

🇺🇸 ICE officers in Minnesota just received new orders explicitly telling them "DO NOT COMMUNICATE OR ENGAGE WITH AGITATORS" during operations – the only communication should be officers issuing commands. The internal guidance says engaging with protesters "serves no purpose… pic.twitter.com/Qtf3KtNtmh — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 29, 2026

Here are 10 flaming examples of times Facebook, YouTube & Amazon explicitly said they only passed censorship policies bc they were threatened by the Biden government

It's my understanding that their Section 230 classification was in jeopardy if they didn't comply…. gives serious question as to how much power the administration state has if they can sidestep our Bill of Rights like this. — Jennifer 31 (@jennifer3185) May 3, 2024 https://twitter.com/Ran_Dumb_Libs/status/1786239017547084045

Uh-oh! It looks like you're using an ad blocker.

Our website relies on ads and the generous support of readers like you to keep delivering free, high-quality content. Right now, we are facing serious funding challenges and we need your help more than ever. Disable your ad blocker and this message will vanish. You can also sign up for a membership to enjoy an ad-free experience while supporting our work: https://citizenwatchreport.com/plans/subscriptions/ Your support helps us stay independent, continue our work, and keep content free for everyone. We truly appreciate your understanding and thank you for standing with us.