CNN panel attacks Nick Shirley for showing up, gets scooped instead. CBS tries to discredit Shirley, ends up confirming daycare fraud. David from Minnesota fraud video offers $100,000 challenge

by

Classic media meltdown. They don’t care about the fraud, they’re mad someone with a camera and a rental car scooped them.

CNN PANEL MELTS DOWN OVER NICK SHIRLEY’S VIRAL FRAUD INVESTIGATION: “YOU CAN’T JUST SHOW UP AND START ASKING QUESTIONS”

They’re not mad about fraud.

They’re mad they got scooped.

A CNN panel unloaded on Nick Shirley’s Minnesota daycare investigation, dismissing him as a “random vigilante justice seeker” who “ordained himself some sort of law enforcement expert.”

One panelist:

“Who is he? Like who gave this guy license to go around?

These random vigilante justice seekers… it’s utterly ridiculous.”

Another called it “racist and xenophobic” and “dangerous,” claiming Trump is “putting a target” on the Somali community.

Their defense:

“Minnesota officials say each facility had been visited at least once in the last six months.

So far they found no evidence of fraud.”

Really?

Then why have 98 people been charged?

Why have 60+ been convicted?

Why did AG Pam Bondi announce “more prosecutions coming”?

Why did HHS freeze payments?

The panel’s real complaint:

“That’s not how you investigate fraud.”

Actually, showing up and asking questions is exactly how journalism works.

Or used to work, before legacy media decided some stories weren’t worth covering.

CNN has bureaus, budgets, and battalions of producers.

Nick Shirley has a camera and a rental car.

He got the story. They didn’t.

Now they’re lecturing him on “how investigative journalism is done.”

Source: CNN /
@nickshirleyy

JUST IN: CBS attempts to discredit Nick Shirley by showing there were actually *FOUR* children at ABC Learning Center the day he visited…

But what CBS ACTUALLY did was PROVE HIM RIGHT.

Babysitting 4 kids while the federal government pays you for 40 KIDS is FRAUD.

This place has taken almost THREE MILLION DOLLARS in subsidies over three years.

And to top it off, they asked the owner if he was committing fraud, and he gave the most unconvincing “no” in history.

Mainstream media has ZERO credibility.