In a legal drama that seems straight out of a suspense thriller, Judge Cannon has given the nod to two amicus briefs filed by Trump’s legal team in the ongoing classified documents case. This unexpected turn of events injects fresh energy into an already intense legal battle.
One of the amicus briefs takes a hard look at the foundation, questioning the integrity of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) referral process. The spotlight shifts to potential flaws in how classified documents found their way into the hands of legal authorities, urging a meticulous examination of the referral process.
The second claim zeroes in on the appointment of Jack Smith, adding an intriguing layer to the unfolding legal narrative. By challenging the legitimacy of Smith’s role, Trump’s legal team aims to cast doubt on the investigative procedures, introducing an element of complexity that could reshape the entire case.
BREAKING: Judge Cannon in Trump classified docs case has accepted two amicus briefs filed by Trump's legal team which may be of considerable help in response to Trump's motions to dismiss.
CLAIMS:
1. NARA referral was flawed2. Jack Smith was improperly appointed pic.twitter.com/FeSRqcsDlW
— Patrick Webb (@RealPatrickWebb) March 6, 2024
www.newsweek.com/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-classified-documents-1876789
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-in-classified-documents-case-will-hear-trump-motions-to-dismiss-next-week/ar-BB1jwqA5
bnnbreaking.com/politics/judge-aileen-cannon-greenlights-amicus-briefs-in-trump-case-sparks-legal-debate