Numerous statements by Chutkan suggesting Trump should be charged for January 6.
Expressing disappointment that Trump was not yet charged –
Criticizing a J6 Defendant's "blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day." pic.twitter.com/O9WVD3WdBP
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 11, 2023
Most notably, Chutkan admitted she pre-judged Trump's guilty: "I have my opinions"
This included conclusions that Trump "encouraged" and "rallied" unlawful action on J6.
Her conduct in Trump's case – the unconstitutional trial setting – just proves that point. pic.twitter.com/RoxXhn1hSr
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 11, 2023
twitchy.com/aaronwalker/2023/09/28/technofog-ruling-in-trumps-dc-case-defies-belief-n2387885
It’s absolutely ridiculous that if you think you have a biased judge you have to bring your evidence to said judge and said judge chooses if they think you have proven their bias. It is literally a he said, she said where one of the parties gets to just choose who’s right.
Seriously, how often is a judge going to admit to being biased this far in to a case especially when all she has to say is basically “no I’m not” and then continue forward?
Corrupt phoney judges and Soros DAs making a mockery of our justice system
h/t PepeLives00