🚨Update: US missiles strike an oil facility deep inside Russia using cruise missiles and ATACMS! pic.twitter.com/FZHN5Kgp1r
— US Civil Defense News (@CaptCoronado) June 1, 2024
Who is he? pic.twitter.com/NwPNzbNa0Z
— Figen (@TheFigen_) May 31, 2024
🚨Update: US officials plan their first attacks on Russian soil using US and NATO weapons launched from Ukraine will begin in a matter of several hours! pic.twitter.com/y3PIfYJkfW
— US Civil Defense News (@CaptCoronado) June 1, 2024
🚨Update: Massive multiple explosions in Belgorod, Russia as NATO unleashes attacks inside Russia!! Russian air defence is active! A huge NATO attack from Ukraine on Russian soil! pic.twitter.com/fW8ikvVBz5
— US Civil Defense News (@CaptCoronado) June 1, 2024
The US allows Ukraine to use its weapons to strike inside Russia, but it is unlikely to be a game-changer
The story of the past 27 months since Russia invaded Ukraine has been one of crumbling taboos. After repelling Russia’s initial march on Kyiv, Ukraine has asked its Western allies for greater and greater support: first ammunition, then tanks, then cluster munitions, then fighter jets.
Each time, the West has agonized over whether to grant Kyiv’s latest request, fearing escalation and a potential Russian response. Each time, the taboo was broken – and nothing happened. What seemed beyond the pale one week had become banal the next.
But the rhythm of deliberation and delay has been hard to shake. Despite securing more weapons from the United States last month, Ukraine has not been able to use them as it pleases. As Moscow this month launched its surprise assault on the northeastern Kharkiv region, Washington forbade Kyiv from using US weapons to strike targets inside Russia.
www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-us-allows-ukraine-to-use-its-weapons-to-strike-inside-russia-but-it-is-unlikely-to-be-a-game-changer/ar-BB1npgGF
www.politico.com/news/2024/05/30/biden-ukraine-weapons-strike-russia-00160731
www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/us/politics/biden-ukraine-russia-weapons.html
h/t DOORBERT