Trump backs ban on congressional stock trades

Trump didn’t just toss out a comment. He fired a direct shot at Capitol privilege. “Absolutely,” he said, when asked if he’d sign a ban on congressional stock trading. That one word sliced through decades of polite dodging on an issue that reeks of ethical rot. And he didn’t stop there. He dragged Nancy Pelosi’s name back into the headlines, pointing squarely at her well-documented market moves that mirrored federal actions with suspicious timing.

This isn’t about party lines. It’s about the growing canyon between public service and private gain. The public sees it clearly. In a 2023 poll, 86% of Americans said they want it stopped. That’s 87% of Republicans. 87% of Democrats. Even 81% of independents nodded in agreement. In a country split on nearly everything, this issue found rare consensus.

The proposal gaining steam isn’t just symbolic. It would cut deep. No more trading for members of Congress, their spouses, or their kids. While the STOCK Act of 2012 was supposed to shine a light on trades, all it really did was create a paper trail. Late filings, no real enforcement, and zero penalties became the norm. The foxes were merely asked to wear name tags inside the henhouse.

Trump’s backing changes the equation. It gives the bill political muscle and media fuel. He’s not just endorsing a policy. He’s daring Congress to expose itself by opposing it. It’s a clever wedge. If lawmakers vote it down, they look guilty. If they pass it, they lose their backdoor portfolio edge.

Across the aisle, momentum is building. Both Republicans and Democrats have floated versions of the bill. A few high-profile senators, perhaps sensing the mood shift, now want in front of the parade. But there’s one problem. Legislators still control the calendar. And ethics reform moves slower than molasses in January.

Still, with Trump leaning in, the pressure’s mounting. Nobody wants to be the name voters remember when Wall Street meets Washington again. And come campaign season, this bill—or its absence—might just write its own attack ad.

Sources:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5267113-donald-trump-congressional-stock-trading-ban/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-sign-bill-banning-114437548.html

https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-shift-towards-limiting-stock-trading-by-members-of-congress/