The Biden administration’s political network is facing an unprecedented wave of federal scrutiny, DOJ, FTC, and FBI target Democratic-linked entities

Federal agencies are tightening their grip on Democratic-affiliated institutions, with a growing list of investigations and legal actions targeting campaign networks, media groups, and even academia. The scale of scrutiny is expanding, hinting at potential systemic issues within these organizations.

ActBlue, the backbone of Democratic campaign fundraising, is now under investigation by the Department of Justice. Officials are reportedly examining foreign-linked transactions and verification failures in donation processing. With allegations of irregularities surfacing, this inquiry could reshape the way political contributions are managed going forward.

Media Matters, the progressive outlet known for targeting conservative voices, has come under fire from the Federal Trade Commission. Regulators are probing whether the group improperly coordinated ad boycotts to manipulate corporate partnerships. If found guilty of misconduct, it could trigger broader discussions on media influence and advertising ethics.

Harvard University is now in the spotlight, with the Department of Homeland Security reviewing potential foreign involvement in its funding sources. The investigation suggests concerns over international ties influencing policy positions at the institution. If confirmed, repercussions could extend to other universities with overseas donors, leading to more stringent regulatory oversight.

A Democratic lawmaker is facing criminal charges from a U.S. Attorney. While details remain sealed, initial reports indicate the accusations involve financial misconduct and possible corruption. The case raises questions about accountability in political circles and whether further investigations into lawmakers will follow.

The FBI has arrested a liberal judge in connection with an ongoing probe into judicial ethics violations. The arrest comes amid growing criticism of judicial activism and concerns over political bias within the court system. This case could fuel debates about transparency in legal decisions and how judicial influence shapes policy outcomes.

Sources:

https://cha.house.gov/2025/5/chairmen-steil-jordan-and-comer-share-actblue-investigation-findings-with-doj

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/24/politics/actblue-trump-memo-doj-probe/index.html

https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/04/25/actblue-massachusetts-trump-justice-department