BREAKING: In a 6-3 ruling, Supreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawful. @Yamiche has the latest. pic.twitter.com/ycQRKdEFwl
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) June 14, 2024
BIG: The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN the federal ban on bump stocks, holding that it is not authorized by existing statute. A 6–3 decision with all three liberals in dissent. t.co/nb4kJgdbfH pic.twitter.com/BIc5WRE0VH
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) June 14, 2024
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) plays a crucial role in interpreting and applying the law. Let’s break down the recent developments:
- Bump Stocks:
- In 2018, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a rule that classified bump stocks as “machine guns.” This classification effectively banned their possession and sale.
- Bump stocks are devices that allow semi-automatic firearms to mimic automatic fire by using the gun’s recoil to rapidly fire multiple rounds.
- In 2020, the SCOTUS declined to hear a challenge to the ATF’s rule, effectively allowing the ban to stand.
- However, in 2021, the SCOTUS ruled that the ATF’s classification of bump stocks as “machine guns” was invalid. As a result, the ban on bump stocks was lifted, and they are no longer considered illegal under federal law.
- Congressional Role:
- The SCOTUS emphasized that it is Congress’s responsibility to address issues related to firearms regulation.
- While the ATF can issue rules and regulations, these are not equivalent to laws passed by Congress.
- Therefore, if there are concerns about bump stocks or any other firearm-related matters, Congress must take legislative action to address them.
In summary, the SCOTUS clarified the legal status of bump stocks and underscored the importance of congressional action in shaping firearm regulations.
h/t jlee2027
Views: 166