Thomas Massie recently brought attention to a startling development: FBI Director Christopher Wray’s resignation, timed right before the release of the Inspector General’s report exposing the FBI’s mishandling of its confidential human sources during the Capitol riot on January 6. For four years, Massie has been demanding answers, and now the truth is beginning to surface.
It’s no coincidence that FBI Director Wray announced his resignation just prior to the release of the IG report exposing activities of FBI confidential human sources at the Capitol on Jan 6.
For four years, I pressed for answers on this. Now the malfeasance is finally exposed.— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 12, 2024
The DOJ Inspector General’s report revealed that dozens of FBI confidential human sources were present at the Capitol on January 6. While the FBI claims that none of these sources were authorized to breach the Capitol, none of the sources who did break the law have faced charges. This is deeply troubling, considering thousands of American citizens have been convicted for similar offenses.
The report also revealed a shocking oversight: the FBI failed to instruct its field offices across the country to gather intel from its confidential human sources in advance of the Capitol breach. FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate admitted that this was a “basic step” the FBI “missed.”
Furthermore, more than two dozen confidential human sources were in Washington, D.C., on January 6. However, none of them were authorized to enter the Capitol or participate in the riot. Despite this, four confidential human sources did enter the Capitol, and eleven more were on restricted grounds. None have faced prosecution.
This raises serious questions about selective prosecution and the blatant obstruction of justice. While ordinary Americans have been sentenced for their involvement in the riot, those working as FBI confidential sources have avoided consequences. This creates a dangerous precedent, undermining the principle of equal justice under the law.
In historical context, this case echoes previous instances of selective enforcement and law enforcement misconduct. The use of confidential human sources is a common practice, but the lack of accountability in this case is deeply concerning.
The fallout from this report will be monumental. It underscores the urgent need for transparency and accountability within the FBI. The public’s trust in law enforcement is on the line, and it’s essential that steps are taken to restore fairness and ensure that justice is applied equally to all.
Sources:
https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011_0.pdf
198 views