The redacted names are likely Dteven Hoffenberg & Sarah Ransome.
This document is an intake tip report.
It is NOT evidence or FBI conclusion.
Sarah Ransome, claimed publicly in 2016/17 that there were tapes.
She said Epstein recorded powerful men having sex with girls & that she had seen or possessed copies of such recordings.
However, during SWORN testimony in the Giuffre v. Maxwell litigation:
she walked back the tape claims and admitted she did not possess tapes.
She acknowledged her earlier statements were exaggerated or based on belief, not firsthand proof.
In court filings, her allegations about recordings were treated as unreliable and unsupported.
Courts credit sworn testimony over books, interviews, or advocacy statements.
And this is why RETARDS who are new to the Epstein game shouldn’t be cherry picking documents to narrative shape fairytales to their followers
The redacted names are likely Dteven Hoffenberg & Sarah Ransome.
This document is an intake tip report.
It is NOT evidence or FBI conclusion.Sarah Ransome, claimed publicly in 2016/17 that there were tapes.
She said Epstein recorded powerful men having sex with girls &… pic.twitter.com/zVB8R4XFYD
— SheThinksFreely (@L08818) December 23, 2025
They’ve been so spun up by narratives and have never taken the time to dig through all of the info that’s been public for over a decade.
It takes hours and days and weeks and months and years to dig through all of this and come to a rational conclusion.
We who have done that…— SheThinksFreely (@L08818) December 23, 2025