ICYMI: You can’t be woke and do science.

by
Sharing is Caring!

Scientific American Editor-In-Chief Has Spectacular Post-Election Social Media Meltdown: Subsequently, Laura Helmuth disavowed her screed and vitriol. Unfortunately, it is a sign that too many scientists would rather offer elitist insults then address reasonable concerns and different ideas.

A few of my recent articles show that progressive ideology has pretty much captured this once-respected publication.

See also  Brace Yourself: Fed and Trump Can't Stop the Looming Financial Crisis as Bond Defaults and Credit Card Debt Delinquencies Skyrocket

One of the primary reasons this descent into madness has accelerated is that the editor-in-chief, Laura Helmuth, has allowed pseudoscience and narratives to flow unfiltered with little if any restraint.

Flush with power after the apparent success of endorsing Biden in 2020, Helmuth and the team at Scientific American endorsed Harris in this election cycle.  Their faulty reasoning and inanity-filled platitudes were met with mocking. But I am sure Helmuth and her crew were sure they positioned Harris for success.

However, when the popular votes were counted and the electoral ones tallied, President Donald J. Trump clearly prevailed.  Arguably, Americans were voting against the progressive agenda that the magazine was pushing.

See also  The markets are clearly set for a massive downside crash. The Fed can’t save you without fueling inflation. The sync movements of yields, the dollar index, and gold are a harbinger of a financial catastrophe.

Once the magnitude of the Trump win became apparent, Helmuth lost all sense of professional decorum and scientific objectivity, and had herself a spectacular social media meltdown.

READ MORE


117 views