EPA And Municipal Water Fluoridation On Trial

Sharing is Caring!

by tamarack

“The former scientific director of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) on Monday took the stand on the fourth day of a landmark trial on water fluoridation, despite efforts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to scuttle his testimony.

Brian Berridge, DVM, Ph.D., testified about the initial findings in the NTP’s draft report linking fluoride to lower IQ in children.”

….”The NTP sought to publish its report in May 2022, but dental officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) pressured HHS Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine to prevent the review from being published….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ntp-brian-berridge-fluoride-trial-public-health/?utm_id=20240206

I will be surprised if this trial is successful at stopping the willful poisoning
of water and beverage products using (government) municipal tap water.

The small amounts of neuro-toxin that disrupts fetal brain development is at issue,
(along with the usual government “we’re always right and you’re always wrong mentality)

So, if the judge agrees with the scientific evidence that small amounts are hazardous
and rules in favor of the ban,,, then that sets a precedent. How many industries will be
affected by the precedent that small amounts of toxins can cause damage in babies?

See also  Latest on trial, jury now in deliberations, DA plays race card.

The Big Ag lobby
The Big Pharma lobby
The Communications Industry (emf pollution)
The Manufacturing and Plastics / Chemical Industries
The Government (MIC & ETC.)
The Transportation Industry
Health and Beauty Industry

Literally this could throw a wrench in a lot of industry.

And the problem is that they are taking the wrong approach.
The suit should be around the fact that people have no informed consent.
Oh,,, but sh*it, didn’t the government just declare that informed consent is no longer
a valid issue and that they can do whatever they want for the “greater good”?

Survey SAYS: This case is doomed.
Drink your fluoride-water, people. It’s supposed to be Anon good Anon for you. And it ain’t going away.

 

UK: Fluoride to be added to drinking water under new legal powers.

“Fluoride will be added to drinking water for millions of Britons under new legal powers, in the biggest expansion of the health measure since the 1980s.”

See also  Diddy denied bail again, with trial set for May 5, over serious charges.

https://fluoridealert.org/news/uk-fluoride-to-be-added-to-drinking-water-under-new-legal-powers/

A summary of the fluoride trial this week is given.

https://fluoridealert.org/news/5-takeaways-from-this-weeks-testimony-in-landmark-fluoride-trial/

It is simply amazing to witness how much time, effort, and tax-payer money the government
has invested in defending the fluoride issue. The suggestion that “they do it for our health” is
ridiculous. 99.999% of all fluoride which is added to the municipal water supply goes WHERE?

Where does all that industrial fluoride waste really go?

I’ll tell you where it goes, since I doubt most of you can guess.
It goes DOWN THE DRAIN.

Can anyone imagine a more wasteful and unnecessary program than this?
The government wastes 99.999% of a resource that they charge us for and claims it is
one of the ten best scientific innovations of the 20th century.

There must be a reason WHY they are absolutely dogmatically irreversibly determined to continue
this scheme and to advance it as far and wide as they possibly can…