DOJ ends DEA’s airport civil asset ‘interdictions’

Sharing is Caring!

The U.S. Department of Justice has officially ended the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) controversial practice of conducting “consensual encounter” searches at airports. This move follows a damning report from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), which raised serious concerns about the legal and operational risks of these searches. “The Justice Department has ordered the DEA to suspend most searches of passengers at airports and other mass transit hubs after an independent investigation found DEA task forces weren’t documenting searches and weren’t properly trained, creating a significant risk of constitutional violations,” reports Reason.com.

This practice, which involved DEA agents intercepting travelers, interrogating them, and searching their bags without proper consent or documentation, has been suspended as of November 21, 2024. The OIG’s findings exposed a troubling lack of training and oversight. “The OIG memo and directive is a victory for advocacy groups that oppose civil asset forfeiture, such as the Institute for Justice,” notes Reason.com. Civil liberties organizations have long criticized the DEA’s tactics, which included using paid informants to flag passengers for searches. These methods raised alarm over potential constitutional violations, as the searches often lacked proper documentation and were not always consensual.

The suspension, which applies to airports and mass transit hubs nationwide, aims to safeguard the constitutional rights of travelers. “The suspension was detailed in a report released by Horowitz, which indicated that the DEA was not adhering to its own policies regarding these encounters, thereby exposing the agency to potential legal challenges,” states Aero News Journal. The decision to suspend these operations is a direct response to the growing concerns and legal challenges surrounding civil asset forfeiture practices.

Advocacy groups like the Institute for Justice have celebrated this development, as the suspension marks a victory for those who oppose unwarranted government searches. The public release of shocking footage earlier this year only intensified the calls for reform. With this suspension, the DOJ signals a shift in how civil asset forfeiture practices will be handled in the future, with a greater emphasis on protecting individual rights.