Constitutional complaint brought against Federal Court Judge for concealing pharma connections

Let’s delve into the allegations against Justice Helen Rofe and the court case related to unapproved GMOs in Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccines:

• Justice Helen Rofe Allegations:
  • A complaint filed with the Federal Court Chief Justice Debra Mortimer alleges that Justice Helen Rofe concealed her connections to Pfizer and the pharmaceutical industry before dismissing a case, to Pfizer’s advantage.
  • Justice Rofe had prior affiliations with Pfizer, both directly and indirectly, during her time at the Bar¹.
  • Additionally, she has substantial associations with the pharmaceutical and scientific research industry, including her family’s involvement in the Grimwade family pharmaceutical fortune and the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI).
• Unapproved GMOs in Pfizer and Moderna Vaccines:
  • Dr. Julian Fidge filed a lawsuit against Pfizer and Moderna, alleging that their mRNA Covid-19 vaccine products contain unapproved genetically modified organisms (GMOs)².
  • The claim is that these companies failed to obtain the appropriate license from the OGTR (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator) before distributing their vaccines in Australia².
  • However, it’s important to note that there is no factual basis for the presence of GMOs in the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulatory agencies have set limits on residual DNA in vaccines, and DNA-containing vaccines (such as the chickenpox vaccine) have been widely used and deemed safe³.

In light of these allegations, PJ O’Brien & Associates is calling for an investigation into Justice Rofe’s conduct by the Upper and Lower Houses of Parliament. It remains to be seen how this case will unfold, but transparency and ethical conduct are crucial in legal proceedings.