Zuckerberg claims Biden admin pressured Facebook, retaliated over refusal to censor memes.

Sharing is Caring!

NEW – Mark Zuckerberg Says the Biden Admin Pushed Meta to Take Down True Information Related to Vaccine Side Effects

"They pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly were true. They basically pushed us and said anything that says that vaccines might have side… pic.twitter.com/1LTZHOqMU7

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) January 10, 2025

In a revealing interview on the Joe Rogan podcast, Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg disclosed how the Biden administration aggressively pressured his company to censor information about the side effects of Covid-19 vaccines, even when that information was accurate. This confession sheds light on a disturbing trend of government interference in free speech and content moderation on social media platforms.

Zuckerberg recounted how officials from the Biden administration would frequently contact Meta, not with requests but with demands, often laced with profanity and anger, to remove content. Specifically, they sought to suppress posts that acknowledged the vaccines could have side effects, a fact that has since been widely recognized. “They pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly true,” Zuckerberg stated, highlighting the absurdity of censoring factual information.

One particular instance involved a meme featuring Leonardo DiCaprio, humorously suggesting that in a decade, people who received the Covid vaccine might be eligible for some form of compensation due to side effects. Despite the administration’s insistence, Zuckerberg and his team refused to censor humor, especially when it was based on truth. “We’re not going to take down humor,” was their response, standing firm against what they perceived as an overreach.

This clash with the government led to a significant backlash against Meta, with various agencies launching investigations into the company, which Zuckerberg described as “brutal.” This retaliation paints a picture of a government using its power to bully tech companies into compliance, not just with misinformation but with information that contradicts official narratives.

The timing of Zuckerberg’s revelations is noteworthy. Coming after Donald Trump’s election victory, this disclosure might be seen as an attempt to curry favor with the incoming administration or as an admission of past compliance under pressure. Critics argue that Meta’s cooperation during the Biden administration, only to speak out now, smacks of opportunism rather than principle.

This situation also aligns with broader moves by Meta to align more closely with conservative sentiments, including the dissolution of its fact-checking team and the termination of all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. These actions suggest a significant strategic pivot, perhaps aimed at appeasing the new political landscape or correcting what some view as past oversteps in content moderation.

The implications of this scenario are profound. It raises questions about the integrity of information during health crises, the role of government in dictating what is acceptable speech on private platforms, and the chilling effect such pressures could have on free discourse. The Biden administration’s tactics, as described by Zuckerberg, could be seen as an attempt to control the narrative around vaccine safety, potentially at the cost of public trust.

Zuckerberg’s candid discussion on the podcast is a stark reminder of the balance tech companies must strike between platform governance and government influence. It also underscores the need for transparency in how content decisions are made, especially when they involve health-related information that could affect public behavior and policy.

As we move forward, the conversation around free speech, government influence, and the responsibilities of tech giants in managing information will undoubtedly intensify. Zuckerberg’s revelations might just be the tip of the iceberg in understanding how narratives are shaped, controlled, or suppressed in the digital age.